
I'm rather surprised people were talking about Catwoman not being suited up for this installment. People keep talking about "realism" and what works in the universe Nolan is trying to create. In my view, this is a misinterpretation of what Nolan's manifesto. And that is, Nolan isn't trying to tone down the comic book elements for its own sake. In fact, in some ways, it's not very analogous to the real world at all. Heath Ledger's Joker is less cartoonish than Jack Nicholson's, but more supernatural, if ambiguously. To be honest, whenever somebody says "comic book style", they betray how little they actually know about comic books.
One needs to look at Nolan's comments regarding masked figures. In the universe the movies present, they insist superheroes don't exist in any form. Now, a world where not even Superman, the Lone Ranger or even Zorro aren't so much as a part of our culture? How does that exactly reflect "the real world"? That pretty much says presenting a down-to-earth fiction isn't the primary goal. The objective is to distill the Batman mythos. To present it in a vacuum, devoid of any context except the modern, civic world. Nolan wants to create a myth out of the cop story.


I think there's another objective as well. It seems to me that Nolan wants to focus on the idea of normal people becoming archetypes by choice. The Joker's interrogation scene explains he thinks that Batman and himself are the wheat compared to society's chafe, and that there's something distinctly "different" and non-human about them, even if they're not strange visitors from another planet, or irradiated mutants. Similar themes are touched on in Watchmen, which, despite the lack of any superhumans other than Doctor Manhattan, seem to treat the given crimefighter as something other than human. "Escalation", "symbols" and "theatricality" are arc words used in Batman Begins, but I think what Nolan is latching onto, in superhero fiction, is the idea the idea of posthumanism. Punks, Goths, Drag Queens, even Furries are examples of a modern culture where we fight against what were given and reinvent ourselves to our own tastes.

Looking at Nolan's films, there's a recurring theme. The Prestige, Inception and Memento are all about mind over matter. They're about people with the will (if accompanying fractured psyches) to customize reality to their purposes. Perhaps in a way, it's important to explore this using the Batman template, because he didn't really become something else by accident, but by his own choice. The Joker also seems to flagrantly reinvent himself to the point of his previous identity seeming to not exist (That is if he is not a supernatural creature the way The Dark Knight tempts you to ask). Interestingly, Two Face became what he was largely by accident, but he seems to very much break from riding shotgun in his own dilemmas. In this sense, Catwoman makes a perfect addiction to the narrative, because she's the ultimate example in taking the world on her terms. Batman is devoted to order and justice. The Joker, for all his shilling of anarchy, shows the hypocritical zealotry of a dogmatic atheist. Catwoman provides a third option of "The world of law has little use to me, but I don't see why I have to salt the fields out of spite". It would also explain why Bane, of all villains, was chosen for this installment. Longtime comic readers will remember he's all about the initiative. He built himself up to counter Batman...just to counter Batman.
It's kind of a shame then that Robin won't be used in Nolan's movies. I always found the idea of a "laughing" crimefighter could add a lot to the saga. In Begins, Wayne dresses like a bat because he's afraid of them. I was always intrigued by the idea of a Batman counterpart who wasn't afraid of anything...
No comments:
Post a Comment